RAW DOGMA                                                                       written by Nkrumah Steward
Pentagon Spurned Plan to chemically initiate Enemy Faggotry

An undated handout photograph, issued on January 18, 2005, that is to be used as evidence in a court martial in Osnabrueck, Germany purports to show Iraqi detainees during simulated oral sex. Three British soldiers pleaded not guilty at a court martial on Tuesday to abusing and sexually humiliating Iraqi civilians in May 2003, although one admitted he had beaten a detained man. THE INDIVIDUALS' FACES HAVE BEEN PIXELATED AT SOURCE TO PROTECT THEIR IDENTITY. So this ends the debate right? Which debate? I am talking about the debate of nature or nurture concerning homosexuality, of course.
The U.S. military rejected a 1994 proposal to develop an “aphrodisiac” to spur homosexual activity among enemy troops.
If a chemical weapon can be produced to make otherwise heterosexual people act homosexually then it can’t all be a “choice”.
To even suggest that you could make a weapon like this assumes that it is an accepted fact that homosexuality is something that can be induced chemically.
Everyone that is gay can’t be straight as an arrow and just deciding to be ostracized, estranged from their families, teased and beaten up just because they choose to be perverted.
There has all ready been mounting evidence from studying homosexuality in other animals like sheep that there are in fact measurable biological differences between homosexual animals and heterosexual animals, particularly in the density of certain areas of the brain that control sexual behavior.
If you ask me, homosexuality is like one of those things where the answer is right in front of your face but no one wants to see it.
But what this proposal means is that that there exist a chemical balance that regulates and determines sexual preference which can be manipulated to create homosexuality.
The proposal, disclosed in response to a Freedom of Information request, called for developing chemicals affecting human behavior "so that discipline and morale in enemy units is adversely affected."
"One distasteful but completely non-lethal example would be strong aphrodisiacs, especially if the chemical also caused homosexual behavior," said the document, obtained by the Sunshine Project. The watchdog group posted the partly blacked-out, three-page document on its Web site.
Also on the list of bizarre mad science type shit the military was proposing were chemicals that would create damn near permanent halitosis and chemicals that would attract stings and biting bugs, rodents and larger aggressive animals.
Personally, I don’t see how this would make an effective weapon. Basically you would just be turning the enemy into convicts.
Men fuck each other all the time in prison.
That's gay. And in case you hadn't heard prison is one of the hardest places to survive on the planet.
Besides, wouldn’t it matter what kind of homosexuals would this chemical turn them into?
I would only call this a weapon if they became the limp risk feminine kind of homosexuals but if it turned them into homosexuals of the professional wrestling variety we could be in trouble.

same difference

Was Adolph Hitler A Homosexual?
Well let’s be honest here. How do you ever really know someone is gay unless you catch them hanging out with Kevin Spacey ?

'Matrix' co-creator Larry Wachowski set to become Linda Wachowski
I don't care what pill you give me. Just don't accidentally give me the one Larry takes. It's probably Premarin.

Source: Reuters

FAQ | terms | privacy | copyright | jobs | CONTACT © 2005 8BM.COM LLC.